Abstract
The subject of the study is to highlight the socio-economic significance of the social component of student training and teachers' activities as competitive participants in the labor market, educational space, highly qualified and patriotic potential of the Ukrainian nation. The purpose of the article is to identify new opportunities for strengthening the social components of training and increasing the competitiveness of future specialists in agricultural universities and their implementation by means of management and administration. The methodological basis of the article is historical, monographic, dialectical, system-structural analysis and synthesis, statistical-economic methods. Results of the article. It was determined that social components can and should be strengthened in the process of professional training of students (responsibility for one's actions in relation to future subordinates, colleagues, partners, consumers, business and environmental ecology; patriotism; educated and intelligent behavior, empathy for others; love for nature as factor of competitive agricultural activity, etc.); industrial and educational and industrial practices (advisory, professional and digital, etc. assistance to rural territorial communities, individuals, enterprises); in the development of student self-government; cultural-mass and socially useful work at the university (participation in cultural-artistic and social events at various levels of organization and management – clubs, competitions, trainings, field days, round tables, Olympiads, presentations, etc.); in the organization of student leisure, food and sports; in ensuring the personal growth of each teacher and student; in the form of volunteer activities of teachers and students; in the process of interaction of the university with local and state authorities, etc. Collectively, these directions can be characterized as the social responsibility of universities and their management and administration. Field of application of results. The results of the article can be used by agricultural universities, public organizations, students, graduate students, teachers; bodies of local self-government and management of rural territorial communities. Conclusions. Therefore, the social components of training students of agricultural universities as future competitive specialists in the labor market are of great importance. We have determined a clear periodization of social work in time (before the war (with the exception of the times of the pandemic), during the war, after it); by locations of conduct (intra-university, external environment, combined events); by subjects of influence, functions, mission - among students, for students, by the forces of students; terms of implementation - permanent, periodic, one-time measures; regarding the educational process and methods of implementation - as part of educational programs, special in additional time, combined, etc. In modern conditions, along with traditional and established social measures, strategic priorities include: administration and provision of healthy nutrition and physical culture and sports for students; support of rural communities by students, including during educational and industrial and complex industrial and pre-diploma practices. It is also development on the basis of social responsibility of teachers and students of volunteer activities. Finally, it is constant support for constant personal growth, self-education, self-improvement, development of an active civic position, including through participation in student and local self-government bodies
Keywords
agricultural universities; social component; training; students; specialists; competitiveness; nutrition; sports; personal growth; volunteering; social responsibility; management; administration
References
1. Vitrenko, Yu. M. (2019). Derzhavne finansuvannya zakladiv vyshchoyi osvity Ukrayiny yak sub'yektiv suchasnoyi rynkovoyi ekonomiky [State financing of higher education institutions of Ukraine as subjects of the modern market economy]. Finansy Ukrayiny, 10, 102-123.
2. Yermakov, O. Yu., Ihnatenko M. M. (2015). Finansovo-investytsiyne zabezpechennya vyrobnychykh innovatsiy ta sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti ahrarnykh pidpryyemstv [Financial and investment support for production innovations and social responsibility of agricultural enterprises]. Investytsiyi : praktyka ta dosvid, 18, 7-10.
3. Kotsur, V. V., Ihnatenko, M. M. (2022). Stratehichni napryamy vykorystannya kryptovalyut yak novitnikh finansovykh instrumentiv [Strategic directions of using cryptocurrencies as the latest financial instruments]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk universytetu, 53, 7-13.
4. Lutsenko, T. A. (2015). Mizhnarodnyy dosvid derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya nauky ta innovatsiynoyi diyalʹnosti [International experience of state regulation of science and innovative activity]. Teoriya ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnya, 2, 311-316.
5. Ihnatenko, M. M. (2015). Teoretychni zasady ta praktychni napryamy formuvannya korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti ahrarnykh i kharchovykh pidpryyemstv [Theoretical principles and practical directions of formation of corporate social responsibility of agricultural and food enterprises]. Ekonomika APK, 1, 78-83.
6. Marmulʹ, L. O., Zhuchinsʹkyy, O. Yu. (2022). Napryamy pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti rozvytku pidpryyemstv sotsialʹnoyi infrastruktury u silʹsʹkykh hromadakh v umovakh detsentralizatsiyi [Directions for improving the efficiency of the development of social infrastructure enterprises in rural communities in conditions of decentralization]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk universytetu, 53, 75-82.
7. Nazymenko, O. V. (2016). Mizhnarodno-pravovi standarty rehulyuvannya trudovykh vidnosyn u sferi naukovoyi, doslidnytsʹkoyi ta vykladatsʹkoyi diyalʹnosti [International legal standards for the regulation of labor relations in the field of scientific, research and teaching activities]. Pravo.ua, 1, 132-138.
8. Romanіuk, I. A. (2020). Vplyv konkurentnoyi borotʹby na upravlinnya marketynhovoyu diyalʹnistyu suchasnykh pidpryyemstv [The influence of competition on the management of marketing activities of modern enterprises]. Molodʹ i silʹsʹkohospodarsʹka tekhnika u KHKHI storichchi: Zb. mater. KHVI-y Mizhnar. forum molodi. Kharkiv: KHNTUSH, 206.
9. Ihnatenko, M. M. (2015). Stanovlennya stratehichnoho upravlinnya sotsialʹnoyu vidpovidalʹnistyu subʺyektiv hospodaryuvannya ahrarnoyi sfery ekonomiky [Formation of strategic management of social responsibility of economic entities in the agrarian sphere of economy]. Visnyk Sumsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriya «Ekonomika i menedzhment», 12(66), 163-168.
10. Kotykova, O. I., Skora, L. R. (2018). Naukova diyalʹnistʹ Ukrayiny u yevropeysʹkomu vymiri [Scientific activity of Ukraine in the European dimension]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 3. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6159
11. Kyrylov, Yu. Ye., Ihnatenko, M. M., Hranovsʹka, V. H. (2021). Sotsialʹno-ekonomichni chynnyky akademichnoyi mobilʹnosti u formuvanni konkurentospromozhnosti predstavnykiv naukovo-osvitnʹoyi spilʹnoty [Socio-economic factors of academic mobility in the formation of competitiveness of representatives of the scientific and educational community]. Ekonomika APK, 12, 73-80.
12. Kotykova, O. I. (2012). Finansuvannya systemy osvity v Ukrayini: stan ta tendentsiyi [Funding of the education system in Ukraine: state and trends]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky Prychornomorʺya, 4 (68), 18-25.
13. Ihnatenko, M., Antoshkin, V., Krukovska, O., Malyshko, V., Marmul, L. (2019). Social Investments as the Highest Manifestation of Implementation of Social Responsibility of the Agribusiness Companies. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8, 3, 7124-7132.
