Abstract
Relevance of research topic. The regional industrialization is one of the most effective strategies of poverty reduction and economic backwardness. Ensuring the inclusiveness of industrial development, particularly from a regional perspective, will create the conditions that best meet the needs of local communities and the existing economic potential of the regions. Formulation of the problem. Inclusive community development requires a holistic, systemic approach that can build a set of coordinated goals and objectives to foster industrial development. Analysis of recent research and publications. The problems of ensuring regional inclusion have recently become the object of study of many international organizations and Ukrainian and foreign scientists: Avdokushin E.F., Acemoglu D., Robinson J., Bobukh I., Schegel S., Mantsurov I.G., Melnyk M.I., Piketti T., Prognimak O.D., Rainert E., Ragnieri R., Ramos R., Reshetilo V.P., Khomenko O.V., and others. Selection of unexplored parts of the general problem. Existing studies are mainly aimed at identifying general issues of inclusive development, clarifying its essence and performance indicators, but do not sufficiently reflect the variety and role of those factors through which such inclusive development is achievable, in particular, at the regional level. Setting the task, the purpose of the study. The aim of the article is to identify the opportunities and limitations of the industrial sector to ensure regional inclusion in the context of regional decentralization and Eurointegration. Method and methodology for conducting research. In the study both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, induction, comparison) and special methods (statistical grouping and ranking, correlation analysis, abstract-logical method, system analysis) are used. Presentation of the main material (results of work). The method of rating the regions of Ukraine by the level of inclusiveness, which is based on 15 socio-economic and environmental indicators is proposed. It allowed to establish the relationship between the GRP per capita, industrial development and the level of regional inclusion on the base of correlation analysis. The reasons for the low inclusiveness of the regions are analyzed. The barriers to industrial development consisting of insufficient investment in industry, technological backwardness of industrial production, lack of coordinated interests and actions of stakeholders, were revealed. The gap between the rates of economic growth of regions and the benchmarks set by the Sustainable Development Goals was designated. The directions of regional institutional development to promote industrial progress and inclusive growth are proposed. The field of application of results: regional industrial policy. Conclusions according to the article. The revealed relationship between the level of industrial development of the region and its inclusiveness allows to argue that a higher level of inclusiveness can be achieved by increasing industrial development in low-rated regions. For this purpose, it is necessary to attract investment in new jobs and decent wages, to develop new institutional technologies, cooperative forms of development and economic management, aimed at wide use of comparative advantages of the regions.
Keywords
industrial policy, regional inclusion, Sustainable Development Goals, social inclusiveness, foreign investments
References
1. Rodrik, D. (2008). Normalizing Industrial Policy. Working Paper No. 3. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.
2. Singh, M. & Wright, A. (Eds.). (2017). The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. World Economic Forum.
3. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Regional Inclusion. URL: https://www.ebrd.com/inclusion (referred on 10.03.2021).
4. UNIDO (2015). Industrial Development Report 2016. The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Overview. URL: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2015-12/EBOOK_IDR2016_OVERVIEW_ENGLISH_0.pdf
5. Avdokushin, E. F., & Ivanova, V. N. (2014). Inklyuzivnoe razvitie: osnovnye napravleniya, bazovye predposylki i vozmozhnye ogranicheniya [The Inclusive Development: Main Directions, Basic Prerequisites and Possible Restrictions]. Voprosy novoy ekonomiki, 3(31), 4–13.
6. Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. (2015). Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nishchety [Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty]. Moscow : АSТ.
7. Bobukh, I. M. & Shchegel, S. M. (2018). Stratehichni oriientyry ekonomichnoho zrostannia Ukrainy: inkliuzyvnist yak kliuchovyi priorytet [Strategic environments of economic growth in ukraine: inclusiveness as a key priority]. Visnuk Natsionalnoyi akasemyi nauk Ukrayiny, 7, 55-70.
8. Mantsurov, I. (2018). Inkliuzyvnyi rozvytok yak osnova protydii hlobalnym vyklykam sohodennia [Inclusive growth as a basis for countering the global challenges of nowadays]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 10 (683), 71-87.
9. Melnyk, M. I. (Ed.) (2019). Inkliuzyvnyi vymir rozvytku mist – tsentriv dilovoi aktyvnosti Ukrainy: tendentsii ta perspektyvy [Inclusive dimension of city development – the centers of business activity of Ukraine: trends and perspectives]: scientific report. NAN Ukrainy. DU “Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen imeni M. I. Dolishnoho NAN Ukrainy”. Lviv.
10. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
11. Prognimak, O. D. (2018). Inkliuzyvnyi rozvytok Ukrainy: pereshkody vs perspektyvy [Inclusive development of Ukraine: obstacles vs prospects]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu, 1 (51), 187-197.
12. Reinert, E. S. (2019). How Rich Countries Got Rich… and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. NY: PublicAffairs.
13. Ranieri, R. & Ramos, R. A. (2013). Inclusive growth: building up a concept. Working Paper, No. 104. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG). URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/71821/1/736729240.pdf
14. Reshetylo, V. P. (2020). Kontseptsiia inkliuzyvnoho staloho rozvytku ta yii realizatsiia v umovakh detsentralizatsii [Concept of inclusive sustainable development and its realization in terms of decentralization]. Inkliuzyvnyi rozvytok ekonomiky v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv sohodennia: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konf. (Kharkiv, 1–28 February 2020). Kharkiv: HNUMG im. О. М. Beketova, 7-12.
15. Khomenko, O. V. (2018). Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty inkliuzyvnoho rozvytku ekonomiky KNR [Theoretical and practical aspects of inclusive development pf economy of CNR]. Kytaieznavchi doslidzhennia, 1, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.15407/chinesest2018.01.069
16. Deineko, L. & Tsyplitska, O. (2020). Regional industrial potential and the objectives of regional industrial policy in terms of deindustrialization. Economic analysis, 30 (1, Part 1), 65-73. URL: https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2020.01.01.065
17. Deineko, L., Sychevskiy, M., Kovalenko, O., Tsyplitska, O., Deineko, O. (2020). The estimation of sectoral contribution to regional divergence in Poland and Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4, 107-120. URL: https://businessperspectives.org/journals/problems-and-perspectives-in-management/issue-365/the-estimation-of-sectoral-contribution-to-regional-divergence-in-poland-and-ukraine
18. YeEK OON, ESKATO (2019). Kak stimulirovat' inklyuzivnyy i ustoychivyy rost subregiona SPEKA? (Spravochno-analiticheskiy dokument) [How to stimulate inclusive and sustainable growth of subregion SPEKA (Reference-analytical document)]. Ekonomicheskiy forum SPEKA 2019 goda «Vzaimosvyazannost': Uproshchenie protsedur torgovli i transporta i ustoychivoe razvitie v subregione SPEKA» (g. Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, 20-21 November 2019).
19. Verner, I. E. (Ed.) (2019). Statystychnyi zbirnyk «Rehiony Ukrainy» 2019. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky.
20. Antipova, A. (2012). To skilky koshtuie roboche mistse? [So how much is a job?]. Holos Ukrainy. Hazeta Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. URL: http://www.golos.com.ua/article/68799
21. Deineko, L. V. (Ed.) (2018). Rozvytok promyslovosti dlia zabezpechennia zrostannia ta onovlennia ukrainskoi ekonomiky : naukovo-analitychna dopovid. NAN Ukrainy, DU “In-t ekon. ta prognoz. NAN Ukrainy”, Kyiv.
22. United Nations Ukraine. Tsili stalogo rozvytku v Ukraini [Goals of sustainable development in Ukraine]. URL: http://sdg.org.ua/ua/ (referred on 09.02.2021).
23. Kovalivska, S. V. & Baranik, V. O. (2021). Zaprovadzhennia mekhanizmiv dosiahnennia tsilei staloho rozvytku v Ukraini u mizhrehionalnomu spivrobitnytstvi [Introduction of mechanisms for achieving the goals of sustainable development in Ukraine in interregional cooperation]. Kyiv, NISD. URL: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2021-01/csr.pdf (referred on 09.02.2021).
24. Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi stratehii rehionalnoho rozvytku na 2021-2027 roky [On approval of the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021-2027]: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, 5 August 2020, No. 695. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennya-derzhavnoyi-strategiyi-regionalnogo-rozvitku-na-20212027-t50820 (referred on 09.02.2021).
