Abstract
The relevance of the topic is due to the need to anticipate the risks of sustainable development of the regions of Belarus. Purpose: risk assessment of the sustainable development of the regions of Belarus. Methods – analysis, synthesis, comparisons, rankings, tabular, graphical. Results of work: study of comparative methodological approaches to assessing the risks of sustainable development of regions. Adaptation of methods of regional risk ranking to the plane of their quantitative measurement. Development of a methodological approach to ranking potential threats to spatial development based on average values. Identification of the most significant types of risks that limit the possibilities of sustainable development of territories. Conclusions: the analysis of the literature sources revealed the advantages and disadvantages of methodological approaches to assessing the risks of sustainable development of regions. Structuring and quantitative assessment of the risks of sustainable development of the territories of Belarus allowed us to solve two main tasks: to identify the most problematic areas of development of the regions and rank them based on the identified factors. A register of risks of sustainable spatial development has been compiled, which allows specifying the directions of their prevention in the context of the studied territories.
Keywords
risks, sustainable development, regions, ranking, evaluation
References
1. Mierzwa, Z. (2017). Implementation of Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Warning Forecasting. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 5(4). 22-36.
2. Vinokur, I. R. (2019). Metodika analiza i upravleniya riskami [Methods of analysis and risk management]. Vestnik Permskogo nacional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Social'no-ekonomicheskie nauki, 2. 18-24.
3. Ahunov, R. (2015). Problemy mezhregional'noj konkurencii za federal'nye resursy [Problems of interregional competition for federal resources]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 1. 82-87.
4. Hitrova, E. M. (2018). Metody ocenki regional'nogo riska i upravleniya im [Methods for assessing regional risk and management]. Izvestiya Bajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2. 24-30.
5. Upravlenie riskami v sistemah normativnogo regulirovaniya [Risk management in regulatory systems]. EEK OON. URL: https://unece.org/DAM/trade/Publications/WP6_ECE_TRADE_390R.pdf.
6. Buyanova, M. E. (2012). Ocenka riska social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Yuga Rossii (faktornyj podhod) [Assessment of the risk of socio-economic development of the regions of the South of Russia (factor approach)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Ekologiya. Ekonomika, 1. 84-93.
7. Kovarda, V. V. (2019). O neobhodimosti vydeleniya pokazatelej-stimulyatorov i pokazatelej-destimulyatorov pri opredelenii urovnya social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [On the need to highlight the indicators-stimulants and indicators-de-stimulators in determining the level of socio-economic development]. Vestnik Evrazijskoj nauki, 3. 8-24.
8. Statisticheskij ezhegodnik Respublike Belarus' [Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Belarus], 2020. Nacional'nyj statisticheskij komitet Respubliki Belarus'. URL: https://www.belstat.gov.by/ofitsialnaya-statistika/publications/izdania/public_compilation/index_18023/.
