Abstract
The subject of the study is the strategic imperatives of sustainable development management, which are understood as dominant priorities for a certain period of time. In this context, at this stage, they are most closely related to economic and national security and their institutional indicators. The purpose of the article is to define a set of institutional indicators, problems and possibilities of their use in accordance with the strategic imperatives of managing sustainable development. The methodological basis of the article is the methods and approaches of economic, institutional and theory of sustainable development. In particular, historical, monographic, system-structural analysis and synthesis, indicative are used. Results of the article. As a result of the study, it was found that institutional indicators of sustainable development are related to various spheres of activity: social, industrial and economic, monetary policy and currency regulation, public administration. They are different in nature, but they are united by normative and threshold values and constraints as favorable or critical for sustainable development. This concerns the quantification of the impact of formal and informal institutions, as well as the emergence of pseudo-institutions. Therefore, the institutional system and its dynamics – the modernization of existing institutions and the creation of new institutions – are of strategic importance for sustainable development. Field of application of results. Local self-government bodies, business structures, institutions of the social sphere, institutions of higher education. Conclusions. The interrelationship of the institutional environment, the presence of threats to sustainable development and the state of economic security of the country testify to the legality of using institutional indicators in the management of sustainable development. Under the condition of further research of the institutional components of economic security, a much more accurate and detailed description of the institutional component of sustainable development, the development of methods for its assessment, the determination of indicators, indices, and threshold values can be achieved. Regarding the institutions of civil society, as well as the institutions of sustainable development, they need further development. Therefore, the reorganization of economic security priorities and institutional modernization can be delayed for a long time, which should not be allowed. If the national government is able to combine the protection of national interests with the course of de-corruption, deshadowing, then this will be a big step forward on the way to institutional modernization and the system of economic security, and processes of sustainable development
Keywords
sustainable development; national economy; institutional indicators; risks; threshold values; institutions; strategic imperatives; management
References
1. Dichek O. I. (2013). Ekonomichna bezpeka rehioniv – skladova systemy natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky [Economic security of regions is a component of the national security system]. Vcheni zapysky universytetu «KROK». Seriya: Ekonomika, 33, 24-30.
2. Shulʹha I. P. (2014). Ekonomichna bezpeka derzhavy, subʺyektiv hospodaryuvannya ta tinʹova ekonomika [Economic security of the state, economic entities and the shadow economy]. Cherkasy.
3. Marmulʹ L. O., Radyeva M. M. (2006). Mekhanizm formuvannya dyversyfikatsiynoyi polityky pidpryyemstva v umovakh transformatsiynoyi ekonomiky [he mechanism of formation of the company's diversification policy in the conditions of the transformational economy]. Kyiv: NNTS IAE.
4. Hrinenko A. YU. (2020). Udoskonalennya mekhanizmiv realizatsiyi ekonomichnoyi bezpeky derzhavy: problemy, tendentsiyi ta perspektyvy rozvytku v umovakh sotsialʹnykh transformatsiy [Improvement of the mechanisms of implementation of economic security of the state: problems, trends and prospects of development in the conditions of social transformations]. Korsunʹ-Shevchenkivsʹkyy:FOP Maydachenko I.S.
5. Ihnatenko M. M. (2010). Sotsialʹno-ekonomichnyy rozvytok silʹsʹkykh terytoriy [Socio-economic development of rural areas]. Kherson
6. Marmulʹ L. O. (2011). Rolʹ stratehichnoho analizu v upravlinni vyrobnychoyu diyalʹnistyu silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh pidpryyemstv [The role of strategic analysis in the management of production activities of agricultural enterprises]. Naukovi pratsi Poltavsʹkoyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi, 2 (1), 152-156.
7. Hobela V. V., Pitsur YA. S. (2018). Teoretyko-metodolohichnyy analiz protsesu formuvannya optymalʹnoyi systemy upravlinnya ekonomichnoyu bezpekoyu subʺyektiv hospodaryuvannya [Theoretical and methodological analysis of the process of forming an optimal management system for the economic security of economic entities]. Naukovyy visnyk Lʹvivsʹkoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriya ekonomichna, 1, 227-235.
8. Romanіuk I. A. (2017). Derzhavna pidtrymka ta rehulyuvannya rozvytku malykh pidpryyemstv silʹsʹkoho zelenoho turyzmu [State support and regulation of the development of small enterprises of rural green tourism]. Ekonomika i menedzhment kulʹtury, 1, 56-60.
9. Ihnatenko M. M. (2015). Stanovlennya stratehichnoho upravlinnya sotsialʹnoyu vidpovidalʹnistyu subʺyektiv ahrarnoyi sfery ekonomiky [Formation of strategic management of social responsibility of subjects of the agrarian sphere of economy]. Visnyk Sumsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriya Ekonomika i menedzhment, 12, 163-168.
10. Martynenko V. V. (2011). Zahrozy ekonomichniy bezpetsi Ukrayiny v konteksti vyklykiv hlobalizatsiyi [Threats to the economic security of Ukraine in the context of the challenges of globalization]. Ekonomichnyy chasopys – KHKHI, 7-8, 40-43.
11. Vlasyuk O. S. (2014). Teoriya i praktyka ekonomichnoyi bezpeky v systemi nauky pro ekonomiku [Theory and practice of economic security in the system of economic science]. Nats. in-t problem mizhnarodnoyi bezpeky pry Radi nats. bezpeky i oborony Ukrayiny. Kyiv.
12. Romanіuk I. A. (2014). Derzhavna sotsialʹna polityka v zabezpechenni produktyvnoyi zaynyatosti silʹsʹkoho naselennya [State social policy in ensuring productive employment of the rural population]. Ekonomika APK, 10, 105-109.
13. Muntiyan V. I. (2015). Ekonomichna bezpeka Ukrayiny [Economic security of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Libra.
