Abstract
The subject of the study is to determine the impact of military destruction, risks and threats and the resulting changes in the role of factors of functioning and competitiveness of domestic agricultural enterprises. The purpose of the article is to identify and evaluate financial and security factors as the main ones for survival, achievement of competitive advantages and competitiveness of domestic agricultural enterprises in the conditions of war. The methodological basis of the article is the theoretical provisions of enterprise economics, a set of general scientific and special research methods, including: systematic approach, monographic, statistical and economic, analysis and synthesis of economic information. Results of the article. It is substantiated that the formation of competitive advantages and competitiveness of agricultural enterprises is formed by groups of factors of internal organisation and resource potential; customer orientation; competitors; and prospects. However, in the context of martial law, the factors of finance and security of agricultural enterprises have become of paramount importance. Security is understood as protection from missile attacks, invasion, mine contamination and mine explosions, safe accommodation and protection of people. The priorities of agribusinesses are to recover costs before generating profits. Financial performance remains a priority for innovation, staff development, and social responsibility and inclusion programmes. Field of application of results. The conclusions and results of the article can be used in the educational process in the training of students of economic specialities. Conclusions. Domestic agribusiness forms the food security of the state and affects the food security of the world, and the state, with limited budgetary resources of direct support, is the key to the security and competitiveness of agricultural enterprises under martial law
Keywords
agrarian enterprises; war; destruction; risks; uncertainty; survival; competitive advantages; competitiveness; financial resources; security; agricultural market; food exports; state support
References
1. Basiy, N. F., Nechyporenko, V. V., Snitko, Yе. O., Kobetsʹ, S. P. (2023). Suchasnyy dyzayn upravlinnya reklamoyu ta proektamy v umovakh didzhytalizatsiyi, hlobalizatsiyi ta aktyvizatsiyi bezpekovykh mekhanizmiv [Modern Design of Advertising and Project Management in the Context of Digitalisation, Globalisation and Activation of Security Mechanisms]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 8, 113-118.
2. Marmulʹ, L. O., Velychko, T. H., Rohatina, L. P. (2016). Stratehichne upravlinnya finansovo-ekonomichnoyu bezpekoyu ahrarnykh ta kharchovykh pidpryyemstv [Strategic management of financial and economic security of agrarian and food enterprises]. Visnyk Berdyansʹkoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu, 2 (34), 49.
3. Korchynsʹkyy, I. O., Shchadylo, M. I. (2022). Stratehiya realizatsiyi bezpekovykh mekhanizmiv pidvyshchennya rivnya konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryyemstv [Strategy of implementation of security mechanisms for increasing the level of competitiveness of enterprises]. Problemy suchasnykh transformatsiy. Seriya ekonomika ta upravlinnya, 5. URL: https://reicst.com.ua/pmt/issue/view/issue_5_2022
4. Romanіuk, I. A. (2020). Vplyv konkurentnoyi borotʹby na upravlinnya marketynhovoyu diyalʹnistyu suchasnykh pidpryyemstv [The impact of competition on the management of marketing activities of modern enterprises]. Molodʹ i silʹsʹkohospodarsʹka tekhnika u ХХI storichchi [Youth and agricultural machinery in the XXI century]: Zb. mater. ХVI-y Mizhnar. forum molodi. Kharkiv: KHNTUSH, 206.
5. Maletsʹka, O., Bochko, O., Dranus, L. (2022). Paradyhma konkurentospromozhnosti derzhavy v tsyfroviy ekonomitsi [The paradigm of state competitiveness in the digital economy]. Ahrarna ekonomika, 15, 1-2, 9-17.
6. Ihnatenko, M. M. (2017). Formuvannya informatsiynoyi bezpeky pidpryyemstv i orhanizatsiy v umovakh avtomatyzatsiyi obliku ta finansovoyi zvitnosti [Formation of information security of enterprises and organisations in the conditions of automation of accounting and financial reporting]. Visnyk Berdyansʹkoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu, 4, 84-88.
7. Zahursʹkyy, O. M. (2015). Konkurentospromozhnistʹ ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky Ukrayiny : instytutsionalʹnyy aspekt [Competitiveness of the agrarian sector of the Ukrainian economy: institutional aspect]. Kyiv: Universytet «Ukrayina»
8. Shvetsʹ, Yu. A., Butenko, A. A. (2017). Analiz konkurentospromozhnosti silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh pidpryyemstv: osnovni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Analysis of the competitiveness of agricultural enterprises: main problems and prospects for development]. Visnyk ZHDTU. Seriya: ekonomika, upravlinnya ta administruvannya, 2(80), 49-53.
9. Marko, I. Yu., Radchenko, O. D., Melʹnychuk, O. O. (2021). Finansovi ryzyky byudzhetnoyi bezpeky ta yikh derzhavne rehulyuvannya [Financial risks of budget security and their state regulation]. Ekonomika APK, 8, 67-78.
10. Syevidova, I. O., Mandych, O. V., Kvyatko, T. M., Babko, N. M., Romanіuk, I. A. (2020). Konkurentospromozhnistʹ pidpryyemstva [Competitiveness of the enterprise]. Kharkiv: KHNTUSH.
11. Ostashko, T. O. (2021). Rozvytok natsionalʹnoyi torhovelʹnoyi polityky dlya pidvyshchennya konkurentospromozhnosti ekonomiky Ukrayiny [Development of national trade policy to increase the competitiveness of the Ukrainian economy]. DU «In-t ekon. ta prohnozuv. NAN Ukrayiny», Kyiv
12. Aranchiy, V. I., Ihnatenko, M. M. (2018). Sutnistʹ ryzykiv pidpryyemnytsʹkoyi diyalʹnosti ta yikh otsinka z metoyu nivelyuvannya y unyknennya v upravlinni efektyvnistyu y konkurentospromozhnistyu rozvytku [The essence of business risks and their assessment for the purpose of levelling and avoidance in managing the efficiency and competitiveness of development]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk universytetu, 39, 52-58.
13. Ilʹyin, V. Yu., Ilʹyina, O. V. (2016). Konkurentospromozhnistʹ ahrarnykh pidpryyemstv na investytsiyno-innovatsiynykh zasadakh v umovakh hlobalizatsiyi [Competitiveness of agricultural enterprises on investment and innovation basis in the context of globalisation]. Kyiv: NNTS «IAE»
14. Stakhiv, O. A., Adamchuk, T. L. (2017). Faktory konkurentospromozhnosti silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoho pidpryyemstva [Factors of competitiveness of an agricultural enterprise]. Ekonomika i suspilʹstvo, 12, 360-365.
15. Marmul, L., Levaieva, L., Pospolit, V. (2021). Formation of agricultural enterprisesʺ competitiveness on the basis of financial and economic sustainability and security. University Economic Bulletin, 48, 33-39.
