Abstract
In the modern conditions of the development of market relations, the basis of the effective development and competitiveness of Ukrainian enterprises is the management of the competitiveness of their products. This makes it possible to create strong positions in the domestic and foreign markets. Taking into account all stages of the product life cycle, a correctly chosen product quality management strategy will make it possible to ensure the efficiency of the enterprise's development, its competitiveness, and to achieve an increase in the level of profit at all stages of development. The topicality of the topic is determined by the interest of enterprises in the results of their activities and the need to improve the quality of products or services, which in turn requires the improvement of the work of all services and divisions of the enterprise. The purpose of the article. Study of the essence of the competitiveness of the company's products, classification of its parameters and evaluation methods, determination of factors affecting the competitiveness of products in modern conditions. The methods used in the research process: the work uses the method of analysis, generalization, and deduction. Results of the work: The article examines the essence and features of managing the competitiveness of the company's products, its components and structural elements, as well as an analysis of methods of increasing the competitiveness of products in modern conditions. The main tasks and directions for increasing the competitiveness of the company's products in modern conditions have been established. The reasons and consequences of the decrease in the competitiveness of products at the current stage of the country's economic development are analyzed
Keywords
competitiveness; product competitiveness; enterprise competitiveness; competition; product quality; competitive environment
References
1. Ahieiev Ye. Ia. (2010). Upravlinnia yakistiu [Quality management]. Lviv : "Novyi Svit-2010".
2. Arnaut I. P. (2012). Doslidzhennia pidkhodiv shchodo definitsii konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva [Research approaches to the definition of enterprise competitiveness]. Innovatsiina ekonomika – Innovative economy, 3. 111-114.
3. Bulakh I. V., Nadtoka T. B. (2010). Otsinka konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva sfery telekomunikatsii [Evaluation of the competitiveness of enterprises in the field of telecommunications] : Monohrafiia. Donetsk : DRUK-INFO.
4. Voronov A. (2009). Konkurentospromozhnist promyslovoi produktsii [Competitiveness of industrial products]. Standarty ta yakist - Standards and quality, 5. 59-65.
5. Herasymchuk V. H., Rozenplenter A. E. (2001). Ekonomika ta orhanizatsiia vyrobnytstva [Economics and production organization] pidruchnyk. K. : Znannia.
6. Dovhan L. Ye. (2010). Stratehichna stiikist u systemi stratehichnoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Strategic sustainability in the system of strategic enterprise management]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky - Actual problems of the economy, 11. 115–122.
7. Zhytna I. P., Yefremenko O. V. (2010). Metody otsiniuvannia rivnia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv [Methods of assessing the level of competitiveness of enterprises]. URL : http://www.chteiknteu.cv.ua/herald_ru/content/download/archive/2010/ v4/NV-2010-V4_34.pdf
8. Zhukevych S. M. (2012). Konkurentnyi analiz v konteksti stratehichnoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Competitive analysis in the context of strategic enterprise management]. Ekonomichni nauky. Ser.: Ekonomika ta menedzhment, 9 (2). 175-182. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecnem_2012_9%282%29__27
9. Koriahina S. V., Koriahin M. V. (2014). Marketynhovyi audit [Marketing audit]. K. : Tsentr uchbovoi literatury.
10. Koshelupov I. F. (2012). Prohramy pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti orhanizatsii [Programs to increase the competitiveness of organizations]. Visnyk sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen – Herald of socio-economic research, 1 (44).
11. Kubakh P. S. (2004). Marketynh innovatsii abo novykh produktiv [Marketing of innovations or new products]. Marketynh – Marketing.
12. Muraviov A. I., Ihnatiev A. M., Krutik A. B. (2001). Pidpryiemnytstvo [Entrepreneurship] : pidruchnyk.
13. Nyzhnyk I. V. (2012). Upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu promyslovykh pidpryiemstv: metody ta mekhanizmy pidvyshchennia [Managing the competitiveness of industrial enterprises: methods and mechanisms of improvement] : monohrafiia ; za nauk. red. d-ra ekon. nauk M.P. Voinarenka. Khmelnytskyi : KhNU.
14. Radchenko K. I. (2013). Stratehichnyi analiz u biznesi [Strategic analysis in business] : navchalnyi posibnyk. Vydannia 2-he, dopovnene. Lviv : «Novyi svit-2000».
15. Reshetniak O. I. (2012). Planuvannia ta kontrol na pidpryiemstvi [Planning and control at the enterprise] : navchalnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv. Kharkiv : "NUA".
16. Savytska H. V. (2005). Ekonomichnyi analiz diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Economic analysis of enterprise activity] : Navch. posib. K. : Znannia.
17. Sirenko K. (2012). Upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu pidpryiemstva [Economic analysis of enterprise activity]. URL : http://conference.spkneu.org/ 2012/12/sirenko-k/
18. Smyrnov Ye. M. (2009). Teoretychni ta metodychni osnovy otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva [Theoretical and methodical basis for assessing the competitiveness of an enterprise]. Visn. Khmelnytskoho nats. un–tu, 4/2. 130–135. URL : http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/natural/Vchnu/ Ekon/2009_4_2/pdf/130-135.pdf
19. Sokol P. M., Radchenko O. R. (2016). Formuvannia konkurentospromozhnosti silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv v suchasnykh umovakh hospodariuvannia [Formation of competitiveness of agricultural enterprises in modern economic conditions]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Ekonomika i menedzhment» - Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University. Series "Economics and Management", 4 (68). 123-127.
20. Stovolos N. B. (2014). Model formuvannia zahalnoderzhavnoi systemy vyrobnytstva orhanichnoi produktsii [The model of formation of the nationwide system of production of organic products]. Visnyk ZhDTU. Seriia : Ekonomichni nauky – Bulletin of ZHTU. Series: Economic sciences, 4 (70). 98-102.
21. Ulianko K. V. Osnovni pidkhody shchodo otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Basic approaches to assessing the competitiveness of enterprises]. URL : http://www.repository.hneu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1456/1/.pdf
22. Khymych I. H., Tymoshyk N. S., Podvirna T. V. (2020). Pidpryiemnytski ryzyk yiak mozhlyvist zabezpechennia konkurentospromozhnosti [Entrepreneurial risks as an opportunity to ensure competitiveness].Teoretychni ta praktychni pytannia uzghodzhennia interesiv rozvytku terytorialnoi systemy: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi internet-konferentsii. Kharkiv. KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 2020. S.451-453. URL: http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/bitstream/lib/32940/1/%D0%97%D0%B1%D1%96%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B7_%D0%A5%D0%9D%D0%A3_31102020.pdf
23. Chuprina M. O., Andriichuk B .A. (2017). Problemy stratehichnoho upravlinnia na malykh pidpryiemstvakh v umovakh nestabilnoho seredovyshcha [Problems of strategic management at small enterprises in an unstable environment]. Suchasni pidkhody do upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. URL: http://spu.fmm.kpi.ua/issue/archive
24. Shershnova Z. Ie. (2007). Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Anti-crisis management of the enterprise: training] : navch. posib. dlia stud. ekon. spets. usikh form navch. ; zah. red. Z.Ie. Shershnova; Kyivskyi natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi un-t im. Vadyma Hetmana. K. : KNEU.
